sangmami
06-13 11:23 PM
My husband is in the same position too.He is a fellow and got a job to start in 2008 july.lc dne.i 140 pending..
Can he file for i 485....ead for a future job...this has been in our head since this evening....cant wait till tomorrow morning to ask the lawyer:rolleyes:
can any1 explain this?
thanks.
CONGRATS to all to can file for i 485
Can he file for i 485....ead for a future job...this has been in our head since this evening....cant wait till tomorrow morning to ask the lawyer:rolleyes:
can any1 explain this?
thanks.
CONGRATS to all to can file for i 485
wallpaper dave salmoni twitter.
glus
01-02 09:23 AM
hello,
If you applied for their I-130 before the end of 4/2001, then they would be eligible for 245(i) and adjust status even if they are illegally here now. However, for 245(i) to work, would require them being present in the U.S. at the time you applied for I-130. In short, if they were physically present in the U.S. before the end of April of 2001, and if you applied for their I-130 before end of April of 2001, they can adjust in the U.S. If not, they can't. In any case, if they leave the U.S. now for consular processing, they will not be able to receive their immigrant visas because they will trigger a 10-year bar from entry to the U.S. and become inadmissible.
I would advise to speak to an immigration lawyer before doing anything at this time.
If you applied for their I-130 before the end of 4/2001, then they would be eligible for 245(i) and adjust status even if they are illegally here now. However, for 245(i) to work, would require them being present in the U.S. at the time you applied for I-130. In short, if they were physically present in the U.S. before the end of April of 2001, and if you applied for their I-130 before end of April of 2001, they can adjust in the U.S. If not, they can't. In any case, if they leave the U.S. now for consular processing, they will not be able to receive their immigrant visas because they will trigger a 10-year bar from entry to the U.S. and become inadmissible.
I would advise to speak to an immigration lawyer before doing anything at this time.
kirupa
09-08 03:18 AM
Without JavaScript? I don't think that it is possible.
Also, I am assuming you mean Silverlight, but remember that "Page" is valid in WPF as well when dealing with the Navigation classes :)
Also, I am assuming you mean Silverlight, but remember that "Page" is valid in WPF as well when dealing with the Navigation classes :)
2011 tattoo dave salmoni twitter.
honeybee
09-25 03:26 PM
that's excellent news, but may not be very helpful for those whose priority dates are retrogressed, whether the I-140 is approved in 1 month, or 12 months.
Premium processing (i.e. PERM) helps labor applicants more because of the difference in processing times between regular and PERM processing.
For I-140 the average processing time is about 3 months only (source: http://www..com/usa-immigration-trackers/i140-graph/), so what's the big advantage of premium processing for I-140? Are they going to approve I-140 in one day with premium processing?
Premium processing (i.e. PERM) helps labor applicants more because of the difference in processing times between regular and PERM processing.
For I-140 the average processing time is about 3 months only (source: http://www..com/usa-immigration-trackers/i140-graph/), so what's the big advantage of premium processing for I-140? Are they going to approve I-140 in one day with premium processing?
more...
maddunr
12-31 03:05 PM
Change.gov is open for questions again - Round 2 this time.
http://change.gov/page/content/openforquestions20081229/
Can IV post a comprehensive question that all members can vote on?
If you do post a question, make sure to let us know what to search for ;-)
Thanks,
V
http://change.gov/page/content/openforquestions20081229/
Can IV post a comprehensive question that all members can vote on?
If you do post a question, make sure to let us know what to search for ;-)
Thanks,
V
BhanuPriya
01-23 05:06 PM
Could somebody help me review this company.
more...
Machuse
07-11 04:59 PM
I'm interested.....how much??
2010 wallpaper dave salmoni cosmo.
reddymjm
06-19 05:00 PM
I am sorry to ask...If H1B doesn't have I-94 attatched to it and it was approved when my friend was in india, he can work on L1. My question is, if he moves out of country and get H1B stamped, can he work on L1?
As it is not a change of status. If he gets it stamped on his passport and enters the county on H1B. YES he can. I strongly recommend to get his visa stamped in India until unless he has a US degree.
As it is not a change of status. If he gets it stamped on his passport and enters the county on H1B. YES he can. I strongly recommend to get his visa stamped in India until unless he has a US degree.
more...
saimrathi
07-02 02:06 PM
I agree.. lets move on..
hair Dave Salmoni picture gallery
imneedy
05-20 11:27 PM
Hi all,
I submitted an application via premium processing for EB-1a with USCIS at the Texas Premium Processing Centre last month (April 2007).
I received an RFE notification via letter after two weeks listing the requirement of further evidence against 3 out of the 8 criteria I submitted.
I can submit further evidence - but my question is this ... "Why have they not made mention of the other 5 criteria I submitted" ? Has this failed ? Do they not matter ?. I am quite concerned because they have not made any mention of my other criteria ? Does anyone have any advice.
Thanks in advance.
There is a complete black box on the other side and you should be prepared for all 8 in case a query comes. good luck!
I submitted an application via premium processing for EB-1a with USCIS at the Texas Premium Processing Centre last month (April 2007).
I received an RFE notification via letter after two weeks listing the requirement of further evidence against 3 out of the 8 criteria I submitted.
I can submit further evidence - but my question is this ... "Why have they not made mention of the other 5 criteria I submitted" ? Has this failed ? Do they not matter ?. I am quite concerned because they have not made any mention of my other criteria ? Does anyone have any advice.
Thanks in advance.
There is a complete black box on the other side and you should be prepared for all 8 in case a query comes. good luck!
more...
glus
02-23 01:54 PM
If the position you are being sponsored is 50% or more different than the position under which you have gained your experience, then experience gained in the same company can be counted. Your attorney somehow has to show that the postion you have now is more than 50% different (duties etc) than the new one. This is a tricky one and you would need a GOOOOOOD attorney to do that.
G
G
hot hair Dave Salmoni: davesalmoni0722 dave salmoni twitter. dresses dave
aranya
06-01 04:10 PM
It is very possible that my question might have already been answered in the past but after searching through many forums, I could not find a direct answer.
Here�s my situation:
Category: EB2
PERM approved.
I 140 approved.
PD � Dec 2007.
H1-B status: 6 yrs expiring Sep 10. Filed for 3 yr extension.
I have an excellent chance of a promotion to a managerial level position. I am seriously considering abandoning my current GC process, accept the managerial position and reapplying for a new H1-B and GC.
Questions:
1. Will I need a new H1-B? If so, for how many years will I get it?
2. When I apply for a new PERM, will PD of Dec 2007 still be valid?
Thanks.
1. You will need a new H1-B with a new LCA appropriate duties and responsibilities, wages etc.
2. Yes. You can retain the old PD with the I-140. Take care to note that that you are not applying for the PERM but your company will be and your company may or may not find qualified citizens/permanent residents. You do not and should not control the recruitment process.
Here�s my situation:
Category: EB2
PERM approved.
I 140 approved.
PD � Dec 2007.
H1-B status: 6 yrs expiring Sep 10. Filed for 3 yr extension.
I have an excellent chance of a promotion to a managerial level position. I am seriously considering abandoning my current GC process, accept the managerial position and reapplying for a new H1-B and GC.
Questions:
1. Will I need a new H1-B? If so, for how many years will I get it?
2. When I apply for a new PERM, will PD of Dec 2007 still be valid?
Thanks.
1. You will need a new H1-B with a new LCA appropriate duties and responsibilities, wages etc.
2. Yes. You can retain the old PD with the I-140. Take care to note that that you are not applying for the PERM but your company will be and your company may or may not find qualified citizens/permanent residents. You do not and should not control the recruitment process.
more...
house Dave Salmoni and friend.
the_jaguar
10-02 12:37 PM
It's taking anywhere between 4 to 6 weeks on an average after the introduction of the new lockbox system. We received our receipts in 29 days, so I don't think you should panic yet :)
tattoo Dave Salmoni. hair Dave
CRAZYMONK
04-07 12:03 PM
I entered US on H1 and the officer stamped the I-94 expiry date to the expiry date of the passport. I applied for a new passport but forgot about the I-94 expiry date. Does it mean that my H1B is expired and not valid? Can I re-enter US on the same H1B visa. Or, my H1B is no longer valid and I have to use AP?
Please let me know.
When did your I94 expired?
Even though it expired and if you are having a EAD you are legal.
Your H1B visa is still valid. If you want you can reenter using the same H1B Visa.
All you need is to extend your stay. I think you can do it by contacting CBP office in your area.
Please let me know.
When did your I94 expired?
Even though it expired and if you are having a EAD you are legal.
Your H1B visa is still valid. If you want you can reenter using the same H1B Visa.
All you need is to extend your stay. I think you can do it by contacting CBP office in your area.
more...
pictures I Am A TV Junkie: Dave Salmoni
pillagandhi
04-28 10:19 AM
Update
went from initial review to acceptance at california
4/11-Received vermont
4/25 - initial review - transferred to california
4/27 - Acceptance !!! and they do not tell us if this is premium processing or not
went from initial review to acceptance at california
4/11-Received vermont
4/25 - initial review - transferred to california
4/27 - Acceptance !!! and they do not tell us if this is premium processing or not
dresses dave salmoni twitter. dave
chanduv23
04-02 04:11 PM
Actually stay outside the country does not constitute towards bench time. So if you are outside country - you are not in bench. One American Consulting company I used to work for way back in 2001 - used to move benched candidates to Canada (if they need to be benched for long time) and then bring them back when they get a project.
Please remember that you may be asked to prove you have a project at POE so when you come back have copies of contract to prove it.
Please verify with an Attorney on my statement above.
Please remember that you may be asked to prove you have a project at POE so when you come back have copies of contract to prove it.
Please verify with an Attorney on my statement above.
more...
makeup girlfriend hair Dave Salmoni
InTheMoment
08-04 09:28 PM
Please search the forum, this has been extensively discussed very recently.
girlfriend Dave Salmoni Gallery
paskal
09-05 12:02 PM
so many reasons not to attend.
why are you searching?
but then "one more" suggests you have your list already.
as if you or I are attending (or not) because of the attitude of 'desis'
please gimme a break.
there are also reasons TO attend.
spend some time on that please.
btw the first 4 lines of that are good...need a better punchline!
why are you searching?
but then "one more" suggests you have your list already.
as if you or I are attending (or not) because of the attitude of 'desis'
please gimme a break.
there are also reasons TO attend.
spend some time on that please.
btw the first 4 lines of that are good...need a better punchline!
hairstyles Sr. and Dave Salmoni - The
apahilaj
07-22 01:08 PM
Hi,
Regarding A# on I 140, if you've missed that in your 485 application, it's no big deal as long as you've sent a copy of your I-140 approval notice that has the A# mentioned in it.
Just my 2 cents...
Regarding A# on I 140, if you've missed that in your 485 application, it's no big deal as long as you've sent a copy of your I-140 approval notice that has the A# mentioned in it.
Just my 2 cents...
Blog Feeds
09-10 07:50 PM
Hunton Immigration and Nationality Law Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
On July 1, 2010, the Vital Statistics Office of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico began issuing new, more secure Puerto Rican birth certificates to US Citizens born in Puerto Rico. As of October 1, 2010, all certified copies of Puerto Rican birth certificates issued prior to July 1, 2010, will no longer be valid. Accordingly, the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a press release providing guidance to US employers with regard to the I-9 process. For new employees, employers may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates through September 30, 2010; after that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates (issued on or after July 1, 2010) we be acceptable for I-9 purposes. Therefore, as of October 1, 2010, employers must pay close attention to the issuance date of Puerto Rican birth certificates presented for I-9 purposes.
For existing employees, there is no need to re-verify the employment authorization of employees who previously presented pre-July 1, 2010, Puerto Rican birth certificates. Federal Contractors subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation E-Verify clause may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates prior to October 1, 2010, but beginning on that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates issued on or after July 1, 2010, will be acceptable. Federal Contractors may not ask for the newer version during I-9 reverification of those individuals who previously presented the older version of the Puerto Rican birth certificates.
The USCIS memo can be found here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=45e3285ca77fa210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/25g-Wwo_N40
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/25g-Wwo_N40/)
On July 1, 2010, the Vital Statistics Office of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico began issuing new, more secure Puerto Rican birth certificates to US Citizens born in Puerto Rico. As of October 1, 2010, all certified copies of Puerto Rican birth certificates issued prior to July 1, 2010, will no longer be valid. Accordingly, the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a press release providing guidance to US employers with regard to the I-9 process. For new employees, employers may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates through September 30, 2010; after that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates (issued on or after July 1, 2010) we be acceptable for I-9 purposes. Therefore, as of October 1, 2010, employers must pay close attention to the issuance date of Puerto Rican birth certificates presented for I-9 purposes.
For existing employees, there is no need to re-verify the employment authorization of employees who previously presented pre-July 1, 2010, Puerto Rican birth certificates. Federal Contractors subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation E-Verify clause may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates prior to October 1, 2010, but beginning on that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates issued on or after July 1, 2010, will be acceptable. Federal Contractors may not ask for the newer version during I-9 reverification of those individuals who previously presented the older version of the Puerto Rican birth certificates.
The USCIS memo can be found here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=45e3285ca77fa210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/25g-Wwo_N40
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/25g-Wwo_N40/)
India_USA
09-09 08:15 AM
Isn't this the same argument one of the members said regarding the 500 visas not allocated to EB3 India last year?
No comments:
Post a Comment